|
New
York City: This week the
Bush Administration sought
to reverse historic agreements
that have significantly
contributed to advancing
the rights, economic status
and health of the world's
women. The United States
was the only country to
reverse long-standing
support of the historic
agreements reached in
Cairo in 1994 and Beijing
in 1995.
"This
is a devastating blow
to women around the world.
The actions of the Bush
Administration means more
women will continue to
die because of inadequate
reproductive rights and
health programs,"
noted June Zeitlin, Executive
Director of WEDO, the
Women's Environment and
Development Organization.
"Furthermore,
the Administration's unilateral
policy reversals on women's
rights will only perpetuate
and reinforce the inequalities
between women and men
in the economy and in
society," Zeitlin
added.
"I
was disappointed to watch
the United States reverse
itself on the historic
Beijing agreement,"
added Charlotte Bunch,
Executive Director of
the Center for Women's
Global Leadership at Rutgers
University. "Many
of us have devoted decades
of our lives working with
women around the world
on this and other issues.
Until the Bush Administration,
the United States has
provided leadership on
many women's rights issues.
Fortunately, not one country
supported the direction
of this isolationist move,"
she added.
Yesterday
in New York, the United
States was the only one
of 42 countries at the
U.N. Commission on the
Status of Women meeting
to reject a resolution
on the release of women
and children hostages
because it contained language
on reaffirming the Beijing
Platform. The resolution
condemned violent acts
as the consequences of
hostage taking, in particular,
torture, murder, rape,
slavery, and trafficking
in women and children.
It calls for the immediate
release of women and children
taken hostage in armed
conflict.
In
Santiago, Chile, at a
regional planning meeting
of the Economic Commission
for Latin America and
the Caribbean (ECLAC),
the United States was
the only one of 38 country
delegations to oppose
a declaration of support
for the International
Consensus on Population
and Development (ICPD)
adopted in Cairo in 1994.
The
historic ICPD Programme
of Action rejected quotas
and demographic targets,
agreeing instead on the
need to invest in meeting
the needs of individuals
for education, reproductive
health care and services,
especially for women.
In 1994, the United States
was a leader in drafting
the consensus, but the
Bush administration has
sought to recast the document
in ideological terms,
eliminating all references
to "reproductive
health services"
and "condoms"
and asserting parental
control over all adolescent
decision-making irregardless
of the family situation.
|